1 2025:CGHC:19906 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 3307 of 2025 Basant Aditya S/o Late Parasram Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Ward No. 09 Budhwari Mohalla Baloda, Police Station And Tehsil Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Baloda, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr. N.K. Chatterjee, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 30.04.2025 1. The applicant has preferred this Second Bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of bail as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 387 of 2024, registered at Police Station- Baloda, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 103(1), 105, 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 2 2. The prosecution story in brief, is that, since the allegation against the present applicant is that the applicant along with co- accused Rajni Shandil made a conspiracy and mixed the poison in the wine and get the same to Rupesh Shandey and Shiva Banjare. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant is in jail since 29.10.2024 charge sheet has been filed and conclusion of the trial will take some time. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant as there are evidence to prove the direct involvement of the present applicant. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that all the evidences are against the applicant. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the case and other materials available on record. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and further considering the nature of offence, particularly to the fact that two witnesses have been examined. The present case is a double murder case and Suhaga has been purchased from Amazon, of which receipt is also found by the prosecution 3 during the course of investigation and some part of suhaga has also been found from the present applicant. Moreover FSL report is also positive. Hence in the considered opinion of this court the present case is not a fit case for granting bail to the applicant, as there are evidences which could clearly show the direct involvement of the applicant. 7. Accordingly, the present MCRC stands rejected. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge alfiza