HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: WP(C) No. 2743/2025 Meenakshi Gupta ..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Ram S. Chauhan, Advocate Vs U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 29.09.2025 After arguing for a while, when confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy under law. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed along with connected application(s) as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 29.09.2025 Mihul Sr. No. 135 Mihul Singh 2025.09.29 19:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document