Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50062 (CHH)

MRS. AISHWARYA SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2497/2025 · 2025-08-10

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:40033-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2497 of 2025 Mrs. Aishwarya Sharma W/o Shri Premjeet Sharma Aged About 43 Years R/o A/1101 Dheeraj Jamuna, Chicholi, Bandar, Malad West, Mumbai (Mh) Permanent Address - 44/2 Indrapuri Police Station Patliputra Patna Bihar - 800024 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Supela, Police Outpost - Smriti Nagar, District - Durg (C.G.) 2 - Mr. Jasmindar Singh Digwa Proprietor Of M/s Top Careers R/o Office At Junwani Road, Pushpak Nagar, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai (C.G.) - 490020 3 - Mr. Parichay Das Proprietor Of M/s Gts Global R/o Office At Flat No. E4/8 Chouhan Town Junwani Road Bhilai Durg (C.G.) - 490020 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Smita Jha, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Sakib Ahmad, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 11/08/2025 1. By this petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, the petitioners have prayed for the following relief(s): AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.08.11 18:17:18 +0530 2 “It is therefore prayed that his Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash FIR dated 02/07/2025 Annexure P-1 in the interest of justice.” 2. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the petitioner has filed the present petition without appropriate prayer which is defective one, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer as there is offence in the prayer have not mentioned, to which, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with proper prayer. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for, subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Multi-Disabled Home, Village Pendri, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Amardeep/Jyoti