[2025:RJ-JP:29891] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1302/2025 Vijendra Dhetarwal S/o Gopikrishan Jat, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Badet, Police Station Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu At Present R/o Plot No. 82, Gali Number 6, Poonia Colony, Churu At Present Posted As Junior Engineer (Civil) (Degreeholder), Section Sikar, Sub- Section Sikar Ii, Rajasthan State Agricultureal Marketing Board (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Madhav Mitra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Veerendra Singh Ms. Jaya Mitra For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 05/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.95/2024 registered at Special Police Station (S.O.G), District ATS & SOG for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC and Sections 3, 4 & 6 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992. 2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It [2025:RJ-JP:29891] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1302/2025] is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that there is allegation against the petitioner of obtaining employment on the basis of forged degree and entire offence is based on documents. Counsel submits that petitioner has already been terminated from his service. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since 20.12.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet, alleged offences are triable by Magistrate, as also considering the fact that petitioner has already been terminated from his service and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Vijendra Dhetarwal S/o Gopikrishan Jat shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees [2025:RJ-JP:29891] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1302/2025] Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /35