1 2025:CGHC:11840 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 76 of 2023 1 - Smt. Leela Verma W/o Shri Heeralal Verma Aged About 52 Years R/o Q. No. 14/c, Sadak No. N.P.A. Sector-5, Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Kumari Roshni Verma D/o Heeralal Verma Aged About 20 Years (Unmarried) R/o Q.No. 14/c, Sadak No. N.P.A. Sector- 5, Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Heeralal Verma S/o Late Kamala Prasad Verma Aged About 55 Years R/o Q. No. 14/c, Sadak No. N.P.A. Sector-5, Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh, Now Q No. 1/c, Street No. 38, Sector-1 Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners : None for the petitioners even in the second round For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 10.03.2025 1. The petitioners have challenged the order passed by the National Lok Adalat, Principal Judge, Family Court, Durg (C.G.) 2. A perusal of the order-sheet dated 14.05.2022 would show that the parties settled the dispute and the petitioners accepted the maintenance to the tune of Rs.12,500/- per month. It would further REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH Date: 2025.03.12 10:52:00 +0530 -2- show that the order-sheet was signed by the parties. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and further, the order was passed with the consent of the parties and the order-sheet contains signatures of the parties, I do not find any good ground to interfere with the order. 4. Consequently, the present petition fails and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha