Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50045 (CHH)

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA

WA/657/2025 · 2025-09-14

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:47099-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 657 of 2025 Vinod Kumar Gupta S/o R.K.P. Gupta Aged About 50 Years R/o House No. 25, Phase-II, Vaishali Nagar, Shrikant Verma Marg, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, New Delhi 110001, District New Delhi 2 - National Highways Authority Of India Through The Chairman, G 5 And 6, Sector-10, Dwarika New Delhi, District New Delhi 3 - Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, National Highways Division Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Cum Competent Authority National Highways Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr.Sushobhit Singh, Advocate For Respondents No.1 and 3 For Respondent No.2 For Respondents No.4 and 5 : : : Ms.Anmol Sharma, Central Government Counsel Mr.Dhiraj Wankhede, Advocate Mr.Yashwant Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.09.16 10:09:46 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 15.09.2025 1. Heard Mr.Sushobhit Singh, learned counsel for the appellant, Ms.Anmol Sharma, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for respondents No.1 & 3, Mr.Dhiraj Wankhede, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and Mr.Yashwant Singh Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for respondents No.4 & 5/State. 2. The appellant has filed this writ appeal against the order dated 25.06.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in WPC No.4146 of 2019, by which learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner / appellant herein. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ appeal with liberty to take recourse to law before learned Single Judge. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to law before learned Single Judge. No cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu