CRM-M-24880 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (1) Vikas @ Boxer State of Haryana (2) Sumit @ Kalia Rahul State of Haryana (3) Bansi Lal State of Haryana CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE Present: 24880-2024 and connected matters IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Vikas @ Boxer Versus State of Haryana @ Kalia Rahul Versus State of Haryana Versus State of Haryana Date of decision : CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE None for the petitioner in CRM Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRM-M-36183 Mr. Anupal Singh Tanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRM-M-38561 Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate (through video conferencing), for the complainant. **** -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24880-2024 …….Petitioner ….Respondent CRM-M-36183-2025 …….Petitioner ….Respondent CRM-M-38561-2025 …….Petitioner ….Respondent 19.08.2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE None for the petitioner in CRM-M-24880-2024. Mr. Jagjeet Beniwal, Advocate, 36183-2025. Mr. Anupal Singh Tanwar, Advocate, 38561-2025. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate (through video conferencing), 2024 …….Petitioner ….Respondent 2025 …….Petitioner ….Respondent 2025 …….Petitioner ….Respondent Mr. Sunil Chaudhary, Advocate (through video conferencing), NAROTAM DASS 2025.08.20 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-24880 SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE 1. have filed these three separate dated 06.11.2023 under Sections 302, 120 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Poli 2. be in custody since 23.11.2023 custody since 18.01.2024. They are facing trial, where allegation against petitioners each to driver of the deceased, and also purchase of GPS device to track movement of the deceased, which led to commission of murder by fire arm injuries by 2.1 @ Kalia Rahul and Bansi Lal have against them, constituting their criminal antecedents. complainant, who is appearing virtuall registered against petitioner Vikas @ Boxer. 3. charge sheet was filed as back as on 08.02.2024, but the trial is yet to commence, this Court is of th atmosphere should be provided to principal prosecution witnesses to depose in the Court, before request of the petitioners for grant of bail is considered. 4. with liberty to the petitioners to re 24880-2024 and connected matters SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) Petitioners Vikas @ Boxer, Sumit @ Kalia Rahul and Bansi Lal these three separate petitions for grant of regular bail in FIR No. dated 06.11.2023 under Sections 302, 120 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Siwani, Bhiwani. Petitioners Vikas @ Boxer and Sumit @ Kalia Rahul are stated to be in custody since 23.11.2023, whereas petitioner Bansi Lal is stated to be in custody since 18.01.2024. They are facing trial, where allegation against oners Vikas @ Boxer and Sumit @ Kalia Rahul is of bribing Rs. 25,000/ each to driver of the deceased, and also purchase of GPS device to track movement of the deceased, which led to commission of murder by fire arm injuries by their co-accused. Reply filed by the State of Punjab reveals that petitioners Sumit @ Kalia Rahul and Bansi Lal have a large against them, constituting their criminal antecedents. complainant, who is appearing virtually, informs that there are other offences registered against petitioner Vikas @ Boxer. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that though charge sheet was filed as back as on 08.02.2024, but the trial is yet to commence, this Court is of the considered view that atmosphere should be provided to principal prosecution witnesses to depose in the Court, before request of the petitioners for grant of bail is considered. Accordingly, the petitions stand dismissed for the time being, with liberty to the petitioners to re-visit the Court, in case the trial gets further -2- ( Oral ) Petitioners Vikas @ Boxer, Sumit @ Kalia Rahul and Bansi Lal for grant of regular bail in FIR No. dated 06.11.2023 under Sections 302, 120-B, 201, 148, 149 IPC and Section ce Station Siwani, Bhiwani. Petitioners Vikas @ Boxer and Sumit @ Kalia Rahul are stated to , whereas petitioner Bansi Lal is stated to be in custody since 18.01.2024. They are facing trial, where allegation against Vikas @ Boxer and Sumit @ Kalia Rahul is of bribing Rs. 25,000/ each to driver of the deceased, and also purchase of GPS device to track movement of the deceased, which led to commission of murder by fire arm y filed by the State of Punjab reveals that petitioners Sumit a large number of other offences registered against them, constituting their criminal antecedents. Learned counsel for the y, informs that there are other offences registered against petitioner Vikas @ Boxer. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that though charge sheet was filed as back as on 08.02.2024, but the trial is yet to e considered view that safe and secure atmosphere should be provided to principal prosecution witnesses to depose in the Court, before request of the petitioners for grant of bail is considered. petitions stand dismissed for the time being, visit the Court, in case the trial gets further Petitioners Vikas @ Boxer, Sumit @ Kalia Rahul and Bansi Lal for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 327 B, 201, 148, 149 IPC and Section Petitioners Vikas @ Boxer and Sumit @ Kalia Rahul are stated to , whereas petitioner Bansi Lal is stated to be in custody since 18.01.2024. They are facing trial, where allegation against Vikas @ Boxer and Sumit @ Kalia Rahul is of bribing Rs. 25,000/- each to driver of the deceased, and also purchase of GPS device to track movement of the deceased, which led to commission of murder by fire arm y filed by the State of Punjab reveals that petitioners Sumit number of other offences registered Learned counsel for the y, informs that there are other offences Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that though charge sheet was filed as back as on 08.02.2024, but the trial is yet to safe and secure atmosphere should be provided to principal prosecution witnesses to depose in petitions stand dismissed for the time being, visit the Court, in case the trial gets further NAROTAM DASS 2025.08.20 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-24880 delayed or after the main prosecution witnesses are examined, whichever is earlier. August 19, 2025 narotam Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 24880-2024 and connected matters delayed or after the main prosecution witnesses are examined, whichever is August 19, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -3- delayed or after the main prosecution witnesses are examined, whichever is ( SHEEL NAGU ) CHIEF JUSTICE Yes/No Yes/No delayed or after the main prosecution witnesses are examined, whichever is NAROTAM DASS 2025.08.20 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment