Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50041 (AP)

Bula Venkata Ramana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/13943/2021 · 2025-09-23

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010240932021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13943/2021 Between: 1. BULA VENKATA RAMANA, S/O MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, WORK INSPECTOR IN WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, R/O D.NO.2-3, VEMAGIRIGATTU, VEMAGIRI VILLAGE KADIAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMAHER DRAVARAM URBAN, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BOMMURU POLICE CIRCLE, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM RURAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADIAM POLICE STATION, KADIAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order or a Direction or a Writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 herein in calling the Petitioner daily to the 4th Respondent Police Station in connection with Crime No.240/2016 of Kadiam P.S., East Godavari District as autocratic, 2 arbitrary, illegal and against to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 4 herein not to subject the Petitioner herein for harassment regularly in the name of investigation in Crime No.240/2016 of Kadiam P.S. East Godavari District in the interests of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim Order by way of Direction by directing the Respondents 1 to 4 herein not to subject the Petitioner herein for harassment regularly in the name of investigation in Crime No.240/2016 of Kadiam P.S. East Godavari District pending disposal of the main Writ Petition in the interests of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHANDRA SEKHAR ILAPAKURTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13493/2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an Order or a Direction or a Writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 3 herein in calling the Petitioner daily to the 4th Respondent Police Station in connection with Crime No.240/2016 of Kadiam P.S., East Godavari District as autocratic, arbitrary, illegal and against to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents 1 to 4 herein not to subject the Petitioner herein for harassment regularly in the name of investigation in Crime No.240/2016 of Kadiam P.S. East Godavari District in the interests of justice and pass…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents would submit that in the light of the Interim Orders passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 dated 22.07.2021, no further orders are required in this matter. 4. For ready reference the Interim Order passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 dated 22.07.2021, is extracted hereunder: “In the meanwhile, there shall an interim direction to respondents 1 to 4 not to summon the petitioner to the police station during his office hours as he has to attend his office as an employee. If his presence is required in connection with any enquiry or investigation in Crime No.240 of 2016 of Kadiam Police Station, East Godavari District, the Investigating Officer shall require the presence of the petitioner only between 8.00 A.M. and 9.30 A.M. and between 6.00 P.M. and 7.30 P.M. He shall not be summoned to the police station during his office hours on working days. On public holidays, he 4 can be summoned between 10.00 A.M. and 5.00 P.M. This direction is to be followed till the next date of hearing.” 5. In the light of the Interim Order passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 dated 22.07.2021, this Writ Petition is disposed of making it as absolute. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.09.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13943 of 2021 Dated.24.09.2025 UPS 209