Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50040 (RAJ)

SHIVJI LAL S/O LODAKYA TELI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18530/2025 · 2025-12-03

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49264] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18530/2025 Shivji Lal S/o Lodakya Teli, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Foji Niwas, Ward No. 18, Pratap Colony, Nainwa, District Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. The Joint Director, School Education, Kota Division, Kota. 4. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Bundi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. This writ petition is preferred with following prayer:- i). Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, directions be issued to the respondents to make fixation of the petitioner equal to the similarly situated candidates having been selected in the same selection process and also to give increment, notional benefit, seniority and promotion to the petitioner as given to the similarly situated candidates. ii). Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant full salary to the petitioner during the probation period in pursuance of judgment of Mahesh Kumar Verma Vs. State & [2025:RJ-JP:49264] (2 of 2) [CW-18530/2025] Ors. SBCWP No.15207/2025 decided on 09.10.2025 by the Hon’ble High Court, Jaipur (Annex.2). iii). Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the benefit of continuity of service to the petitioner and further period of service rendered earlier by him, may kindly be reckoned from the initial date of appointment for the purpose of pensionary benefits. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /40