[2025:RJ-JP:47823] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15560/2025 Ramkesh Meena S/o Shri Chandra Lal Meena, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Kalwari, Tehsil, Todabhim, Post Ramoli, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Women And Child Development Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Integrated Child Development Department, State Of Rajasthan, 2, Janpath Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Director (Nutrition Mission- Poshan Abhiyan), Integrated Child Development Department, State Of Rajasthan, 2, Janpath Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. 4. Lead Guard Services Private Limited, Through Its Director, Office At 312, Vaishali Tower-1St, Nursery Circle, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302021. 5. Deputy Director, Child Development Project Officer, Dausa, Women And Child Development Department, Dholpur, Rajasthan. 6. Child Development Project Officer, Badi, Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar and Mr. S.M. Sharma for Mr. Manoj Kumar, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: [2025:RJ-JP:47823] (2 of 3) [CW-15560/2025] “i. By issuing appropriate writ order or direction, the show cause notice dated 2.07.2025 may be quashed and set aside. ii. By issuing appropriate writ order or direction, Respondents may be directed to recommend the name of the Petitioner for the purpose of absorption as contractual employee, pursuant to the directions issued vide order dated 16.05.2025 and consequent thereto, Petitioner may be absorbed as contractual employee on the post of Block Coordinator under the direct control of Official Respondent and he may be allowed to continue on the post till the currency of the project. iii. That any other order or direction as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fair, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may be passed in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon order dated 10.11.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.549/2024 (Hitendra Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Rodu Lal & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11737/2024. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of accordingly. 3. Mr. Vishal Kumar on behalf of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG accepts notice. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Manoj Shrama, AAG as counsel for the respondents. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of ratio laid down in case of Rodu Lal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and relied in case of Hitendra Kumar Sharma and Ors. [2025:RJ-JP:47823] (3 of 3) [CW-15560/2025] Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) by this Court, at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove, but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he will have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/96