RAHEES KHAN S/O SHRI JAMEEL KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12598/2025 · 2025-10-15
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50030 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50030 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42160] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12598/2025 Rahees Khan S/o Shri Jameel Khan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Semla Kalan, Police Station Jaluki, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Alwar) ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.S. Kachhawa with Mr. Mustak Ahmad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order 15/10/2025 The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity “the BNSS”). The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.240/2025 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Alwar for the offence under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 61(2) and 112(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amended) Act, 2008 (for short, ‘IT Act, 2008) and later on for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 61(2) and 112 of the BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act, 2008.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that he is in custody since 01.09.2025, investigation as against him is complete, offences are triable by Magistrate, he has no criminal
[2025:RJ-JP:42160] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12598/2025] antecedents of similar nature, similarly situated co-accused person namely Jumrat has already been extended benefit of bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 23.09.2025 and prays for his release on bail. Though, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer; but, could not dispute that similarly situated co-accused person namely Jumrat has already been extended benefit of bail by this Court. Heard. Considered. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by
learned counsel for the petitioner, nature of accusation, material available on record, his length of custody, offences being triable by Magistrate, absence of criminal antecedents of similar nature and release of similarly situated co-accused person on bail; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Rahees Khan S/o Shri Jameel Khan shall be released on bail under Section 483 BNSS in connection with aforementioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of ₹50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 480(3) BNSS.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /160