Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50020 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/19802/2021 · 2025-09-15

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 19802 of 2021 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant. However, Sri Shatruhan Yadav, learned AGA for the State is present. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 462 of 2006, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 409, 204, 120B IPC and Section 13(2) P.C. Act, Police Station Sikandra Rao, District Hathras with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial. 3. The instant anticipatory bail application is pending since the year 2021, therefore, it reflects, either applicant has lost the interest in the matter or by efflux of time, the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. 4. In view of above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed. 5. However, it is open for the applicant to file recall application if cause of action still survives. September 16, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sameer Jain,J.) Raj Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad