Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50017 (CHH)

SUBBA RAO CHALLA v. SUPRITI RAO

CRMP/676/2019 · 2025-08-10

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:40084 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 676 of 2019 1 - Subba Rao Challa S/o C.H. Laxmi Sundaram Aged About 61 Years Permanent Address - Flat No. 401, 4th Floor, Jk Rama Lakshmi Apartments, R.K. Puram Road 3, Kothapet, Income Tax Colony, Alkapuri Road, District : Hyderabad, Telangana. 2 - Smt. Padma Challa W/o Subba Rao Challa Aged About 55 Years Permanent Address - Flat No. 401, 4th Floor, Jk Rama Lakshmi Apartments, R.K. Puram Road 3, Kothapet, Income Tax Colony, Alkapuri Road, District : Hyderabad, Telangana. 3 - Vinay Challa S/o Subba Rao Challa Aged About 36 Years Permanent Address - Flat No. 401, 4th Floor, Jk Rama Lakshmi Apartments, R.K. Puram Road 3, Kothapet, Income Tax Colony, Alkapuri Road, Hyderabad District : Hyderabad, Telangana. 4 - Smt. Laxmi Lavanya Devalla W/o Devalla Harish Kumar Aged About 31 Years R/o Flat No. G - 7, Block 06, Diamond Estates, Cbcid Colony, Rama Murthy Nagar, Hyder Nagar, District Hyberabad (Telengana). ... Petitioners versus 1 - Supriti Rao W/o Vinay Challa Aged About 29 Years Presently R/o 18b, Street No. 03, Panchsheel Housing Society, Sector - B, Borsi, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2025.08.12 10:17:00 +0530 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, Advocate. Respondent : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 11/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has lost contact with his clients and has no instructions to proceed. He further informs the court that, as per information received from the district court counsel, the parties have arrived at a settlement. 2. In view of the above submissions, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, this Court has no option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Sourabh P.