APHC010440952023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22884/2023 Between: 1. GUJJU HEMA SUNDAR, S/O. LATE GUJJU I IARISHCHANDRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVAITON, R/O. H.NO. 11-4-3, NELLAKANTA STREET, ITCHAPURAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT SRIKAKULAM. 4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , PALASA KASIBUGGA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , ICHAPURAM POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. TAHSILDAR, ICHAPURAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. ALA CHANDRASEKHAR YADAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22884 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: <…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly the 5th respondent and taking assistance of 6th respondent in interfering in petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment over his agricultural landed property admeasuring with an extent of Ac.1.00 cents covered by survey No. 73/6 situated in A.S Peta of Ichapuram Mandal in Srikakulam District and declare the same as illegal, irregular and irrational, without there being any authority or sanction of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 5 and 6 not to interfere in any manner with petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment over the said agricultural landed property and with his personal life and liberty …= 2. Heard Sri Ala Chandrasekhar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are interfering in the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s property without there being any authority or sanction of law. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that the respondent-police never interfered in the civil disputes as alleged by the petitioner. The police also did not receive any letters of instructions for assistance. 4 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 22884 of 2023 Dated.10.12.2025 UPS 223