IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND 1048 Rachpal Kaur State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: None Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the respondents effecting recovery from the family pension accounts of the petitioners. 2. Reliance in the present petition was placed on judgment dated 20.01.2004 passed in the case 2003, involving the same issue was though dismissed qua claim for dearness allowance and family pension, however, prayer be made was allowed by relying on the judgment in case of of Haryana, 1994(5) SLR 753 best efforts has been unable to controvert and resist disposal of the terms thereof or cite any contrary law. 3. The present petition (supra). 08.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND CHANDIGARH CWP-7958 Date of decision: 08.05.2025 aur and others Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the respondents effecting recovery from the family pension accounts of the Reliance in the present petition was placed on judgment dated 20.01.2004 passed in the case Mukhtiar Singh vs. State of Punjab 2003, involving the same issue was though dismissed qua claim for dearness allowance and family pension, however, prayer be made was allowed by relying on the judgment in case of 1994(5) SLR 753 (SC), which fact learned State counsel despite best efforts has been unable to controvert and resist disposal of the terms thereof or cite any contrary law. The present petition is disposed ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 7958-2007 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.05.2025 ..Petitioners ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Satnam Preet Singh, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing the action of the respondents effecting recovery from the family pension accounts of the Reliance in the present petition was placed on judgment dated Mukhtiar Singh vs. State of Punjab, CWP-891 2003, involving the same issue was though dismissed qua claim for dearness allowance and family pension, however, prayer in respect of recovery sought to be made was allowed by relying on the judgment in case of Sahib Ram vs. State which fact learned State counsel despite best efforts has been unable to controvert and resist disposal of the petition in is disposed of in terms of Mukhtiar Singh ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No action of the respondents effecting recovery from the family pension accounts of the Reliance in the present petition was placed on judgment dated 891- 2003, involving the same issue was though dismissed qua claim for dearness in respect of recovery sought to vs. State which fact learned State counsel despite petition in Mukhtiar Singh ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.08 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document