Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
W.P.(C) No.555 of 2025
Anindya Sarkar, Son of Late Asit Kumar Sarkar, Resident of Joynagar, Lane No.5, P.O.- Agartala, P.S.- West Agartala, District- West Tripura, Pin- 799001
---- Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. Tripura University, Represented by its Registrar, Suryamaninagar, P.O.- Suryamaninagar, P.S.- Amtali, Agartala, District- West Tripura, Pin- 799022. 2. The Registrar, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, P.O.- Suryamaninagar, P.S.- Amtali, Agartala, District- West Tripura, Pin- 799022. 3. The Vice-Chancellor, Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, P.O.- Suryamaninagar, P.S.- Amtali, Agartala, District- Tripura, Pin- 799022. 4. The Assistant Registrar (I/C), Tripura University, Suryamaninagar, P.O.- Suryamaninagar, P.S.- Amtali, Agartala, District- Tripura, Pin-799022. 5. The Finance Officer, Tripura University, having his office at Suryamaninagar, P.O.- Suryamaninagar, P.S.- Amtali, Agartala, District- West Tripura, Pin- 799022. ----Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Koomar Chakraborty, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pradyot Kr. Dhar, Sr. Adv,
Mr. Koushik Paul, Adv. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT Order
07.01.2026
Heard Learned Counsel, Mr. K. Chakraborty appearing on behalf of the petitioner and also heard Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. P. K. Dhar assisted by Learned Counsel, Mr. K. Paul appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2
The petitioner has filed the writ petition seeking the following reliefs: (i) Issue Rule, calling upon the Respondents and each one of them, to show cause as to why a Writ of Certiorari and/or in the nature the Petitioner; thereof, shall not be issued, directing them, to transmit the records, lying with them, for rendering substantive and conscionable justice to the petitioner. (ii) Issue Rule, calling upon the Respondents and each one of them, to show cause as to why a Writ of Mandamus and/or in the nature thereof, shall not be issued, mandating/directing them, to release the arrears, in connection with the annual increments (as accrued on 01.01.2023 & 01.01.2024, during the Study Leave period of the Petitioner), w.e.f. the date of his rejoining (i.e., 09.02.2024), and thereafter, in terms of the next annual increment (w.c.f. 01.01.2025), till the date of 31.07.2025, in favour of the Petitioner,
(iii) Call for the records, appertaining to this Writ Petition;
(iv) After hearing the parties, be pleased to make the Rule absolute in terms of (i) & (ii) above;
(v) Costs of and incidental to this proceeding
(vi) Any other Relief(s) as to this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper.
At the time of hearing, Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the reliefs sought for by the petitioner has been complied with by the respondents and as such nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication. On the other hand, Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. P. K. Dhar assisted by Learned Counsel, Mr. K. Pal appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the subject matter of the writ petition has been complied with by the respondent-university and in support of his contention, Learned Senior Counsel for the respondents submitted three copies of salary slips for the months of September 2025, October 2025 and November 2025 and urged for disposal of this writ petition. 2
After hearing both the sides, it appears that the issues in this case has been resolved by the respondent-University and as such no purpose would be served by keeping this writ petition pending and accordingly, this petition stands disposed of not being pressed by the petitioner. JUDGE
Purnita PURNITA DEB Digitally signed by PURNITA DEB Date: 2026.01.08 15:16:53 +05'30'