Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No. 1229 of 2025
Poonam Khurana and Others ............Petitioners. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others ............Respondents.
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Mani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. Mr. Ankush Singhal, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for respondent no. 3.
4. Learned State counsel make a statement on instructions that the chargesheet has already been filed and as such the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
5. Mr. Saurabh Pandey also submits that since the chargesheet has been filed the writ petition has now been rendered infructuous.
6. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 16.02.2026 PR