Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49991 (AP)

M.c. Parameswaraiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/20164/2016 · 2025-09-24

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010833072016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 20164/2016 Between: 1. M.C. PARAMESWARAIAH, SIC M.C.VEERAIAH AGED ABOUT: 35, OCC:UNEMPLOYED,R/O SRC-13, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT 518101 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRATARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT BUILDING, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ANDHRA PRADESH, BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD. 3. SRI BRAMARAMBA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMYVARLA, DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP. BY THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SAMEER AHMED Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T VENU GOPAL SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION) 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: “….to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ by declaring the action of Respondent No.3 for not allowing the petitioner herein to continue in services on par with the other employees who were taken back into service as per the orders of respondent no.3 dated 24.10.2015 and denying the same to the petitioner herein as arbitrary, illegal and violative of article 14 of the Indian Constitution…..” 2. On 24.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption „for dismissal‟. 3. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption „for dismissal‟, none appeared for the petitioner. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 25.09.2025 Ivd 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.20164 of 2016 Date: 25.09.2025 Ivd