Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4999 (PAT)

Ritik Kumar @ Ritik Kumar Gupta @ Ritik raj Gupta v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/2795/2025 · 2026-03-12

Sandeep Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2795 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2025 Thana- SC/ST District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1. Ritik Kumar @ Ritik Kumar Gupta @ Ritik raj Gupta S/O Dharamjit Saw R/O Vill.- Simara Jamshed, P.S.- Rafiganj, Dist.- Aurangabad. 2. Adarsh Kumar S/O Dharamendra Saw R/O Vill.- Simara Jamshed, P.S.- Rafiganj, Dist.- Aurangabad. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Amrendra Kumar S/O Mahendra Ram R/O Vill.- Simara Jamshed, Post- Bhadawa, P.S.- Rafiganj, Dist.- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms.Usha Kumari 1, Spl.P.P. For the Informant : Mr.Leelawati Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 12-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 24.06.2025 passed by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge- 1st-cum- Special Judge (SC/ST, N.D.P.S. and Children Act), Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad (SC/ST) P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024, registered for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3(i)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(ii)(va) of the S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2795 of 2025(3) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 3. From the FIR, it appears that the appellants assaulted the victim due to which he sustained injury. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the injury has not been discussed in the impugned order. 5. Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned Spl. P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer of the appellants. 6. In these circumstances, this appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellants to file a fresh appeal under the SC/ST Act before the court below for bail and the court below will consider the injury report and pass an order in accordance with law. 7. The appellant no. 2 shall not be arrested for the next two weeks. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T