Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49980 (PNJ)

ANJU BANSAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-CLT-OJ/1/2025 · 2025-07-14

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CRM-CLT-OJ-1-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.07.2025 ANJU BANSAL ......... Peoner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present None for the peoner. Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, DAG, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) On the last date, this Court had passed the following order: The pe oner is absent. On the last date, this Court had passed the following order:- “Legal Aid counsel submits that the pe oner has conveyed to her that she does not want services of any counsel. She wants to appear in person and she sought date a$er 15.08.2025. Given above, Ms. Vibhu Narania, Legal Aid Counsel for the pe oner is discharged from this case. However, such a long date cannot be given as prayed by pe oner. List on 07.07.2025. It is clarified that no further adjournment shall be granted on the next date of hearing. Legal Aid Counsel to convey the date of hearing to pe oner.” In the interest of jus ce, adjourned to 14.07.2025. It is clarified that in the case the pe oner s ll remains absent on the next date of hearing, this Court shall proceed with the ma5er and decide the same by referring to the pleadings only. 2. Even today, none has appeared on behalf of the peoner. It seems that she is no more interested to pursue the present peon. 3. Given above, the present peon is dismissed for non-prosecuon. All pending miscellaneous applicaons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 14.07.2025 Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No JYOTI 2025.07.17 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.