G. Raghavendra reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/2939/2021 · 2025-09-18
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4998 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4998 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010040102021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2939/2021 Between:
1. G. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY,, S/O , KRISHNA REDDY OCC FARMER , AGE 58 YEARS, R/O H. NO. 1-10-2, DINNE DEVARAPADU VILLAGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P-518001.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.
2. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KURNOOL ,KURNOOL DISTRICT.A.P
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, KURNOOL , KURNOOL DISTRICT.A.P.
4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, IV TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT.A.P
5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IV TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT.A.P.
6. DUGENENI RAMANAIAH, SIO DLUGENENI CHINNA VENKATSWAMY,R/O. H. NO. 80-11-117-3, ABBAS NAGAR, NEAR SBI KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT.A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
2
1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2939 of 2021
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 5th respondent in threatening the petitioner to settle the property issue with the unofficial respondent herein and calling the petitioner to the police station either by sending his subordinates or by making calls to the petitioner and making the petitioner to still till odd hours and abusing him in filthy language and threatening him that various criminal cases would be booked against him and him family members if the petitioners does not heed to the warnings of 5th respondent and settle the issue with 6th respondent , as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Arts., 14, 19 (1) (g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, part from various judicial pronouncements of this Honble Court as well as the Honble Apex Court and pass….”
2. Heard Sri V.Nitesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the grievance of the petitioner is that the police are calling the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner and the police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court vide
4
Order dated 08.02.2021, the respondent police are not calling the petitioner to the police station since no crime has been registered against the petitioner and the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and unofficial respondent No.6.
5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station, in absence of any crime against the petitioner. The police are further directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.09.2025. UPS
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.2939 of 2021
Dated.19.09.2025
UPS
669