Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49977 (AP)

YENNENA SUGUNA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/30818/2024 · 2025-01-05

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE MS JUSTICE B. S. BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 30818 OF 2024 Between: 1. Yennena Suguna, W/o. Raminaidu, Age 53 years, Occ: Surpunch, R/o. Purli Grama Panchayat, RegidiAmadalavalasa Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 2. Vavillapalli Nirmala, W/o. Yeruku Naidu, Age 51 years, R/o. 1-19, Main Street, Nayaralavalasa, Srikakulam District, Now Vizianagaram. 3. Nadipena Sanni Babu, S/o. Laxum Naidu, Age 53 years, Occ Surpanch, R/p. Main Street, Latcha Rayapuram, Srikakulam District, Now in Vizianagaram. 4. Palavalasa Rama Chandri Naidu, Occ: Ex-Surpunch, R/o. D.No. 1-27, Pedda Sirlam, RegidiAmadalavalasa Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 5. Vavilapalli Nagabushana Rao, Occ: R/o. Burada Village, RegidiAmadalavalasa Mandal, Vizinagaram District. ...PETfTIONERS AND 1. The State of AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Consumer Affairs and Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner, A.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., D.No. 10-152/1, Civil Supplies Bhavan, 3rd Floor, Sri Sai Towers, Beside SIRIS Company, Kanuru, Vijayawada, Krishna District-520007. 3. The District Collector, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 4. The District Supply Officer, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chipurupalli, Vizianagaram District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents No. 3 to 5 in not considered the roaster points and reservation to the notification vide R.C.No. 556/2024/U.Th dt. 18.12.2024 in their respective villages is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principal of natural justice and consequently set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider the representations of the petitioners by suspending the notification vide RC.No. 556/2024 /U.Th/ dt: 18.12.2024 till such time not to take any coercive steps, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER 1 W.P.No.30818 of 2024 APHC010591322024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] MONDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION NO: 30818/2024 Between: ...PETITIONER(S) Yennena Suguna and Others AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of AP and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following; ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief; “...to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondents No. 3 to 5 in not considering the roaster points and reservation to the notification vide R.C.No.556/2024/U.Th dt 18.12.2024 in their respective villages is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principal of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and pass such other order or orders ” 2 W.P.No.30818 of2024 - Sri Metta Chandra Sekhar Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the relief has become infructuous. 2. In view of the representation, this writ petition is dismissed as 3. infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. Sd/- U.SRI DEVI //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT R^ISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Metta Chendra Sekhar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 2- Supplies, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 3. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr y, HIGH COURT DATED:06/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.30818 of 2024 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS