Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49963 (AP)

Boggarapu Vinayakumar v. Boggarapu Rachaiah Chetty

CMA/819/2007 · 2025-12-22

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010535562007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No: 819 OF 2007 Between: 1. Boggarapu Vinayakumar, S/o.Boggarapu Rachaiah Chetty, aged about 9 years, R/o. Bazar Street, Kalikiri 2. Boggarapu Pushpanjali, D/o.Boggarapu Rachaiah Chetty R/o. Bazar Street Kalikiri Both are minors rep., by their mother and natural guardian Boggarapu Swaroopa Rani, aged 36 years, W/o.Boggarapu Rachaiah Chetty, R/o.Bazar Street, Kalikiri. ...Petitioners AND 1. Boggarapu Rachaiah Chetty, S/o.Munirathnam Chetty R/o. Mangalampeta, Pulicherla Mandal, Chittoor District ...Respondent Appeal Under Section 8(5)(c) of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, against orders in O.P.No.85 of 2007 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle, dated 13.07.2007. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(CMAMP 659 OF 2008 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of CMA.No.819 of 2007 and fix the date for final hearing. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 1743 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of CMA.No. 819/2007 to fix the date for final hearing Counsel for the Petitioners: M N NARASIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent G RAMACHANDRA REDDY The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI And THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM C.M.A.No.819 of 2007 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam) The petition filed by mother, seeking appointment as guardian of minor children as well as other reliefs under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act and Under Section 29 of Guardian and Wards Act, was dismissed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was preferred by the appellant/petitioner. 2. Sri M.Venkata Siva Teja, learned counsel representing Sri M.N.Narasimha Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of afflux of time, the minor children attained majority. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Sri M.N.Sagar Babu, learned counsel on behalf of Sri G.Ramachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent is present. 3. Since the minor children now attained majority, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. 4 No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARARAO KUNCHEAM, J Dt:23.12.2025 Rns 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM C.M.A.No.819 of 2007 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam) Dt:23.12.2025 Rns