R/SCR.A/9822/2025 ORDER DATED: 16/07/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 9822 of 2025 ========================================================== SURAJSINH BHURSINH PARMAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: MR YATISHKUMAR M SOLANKI(13510) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS NEHA Y SOLANKI(13672) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 MR AAYUSH JAIN, ADVOCATE for respondent No.2 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 16/07/2025 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned advocate Mr. Aayush Jain states that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the original complainant and thereby, seeks permission to file his Vakalatnama, which is granted. Heard learned advocates for the respective parties. 2. RULE. Learned advocates waive service of note of rule on behalf of the respective respondents. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and since it is jointly stated at the Bar by learned advocates on both the sides that the dispute between the parties has been resolved amicably, this matter is taken up for final disposal forthwith. 4. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”), the applicant has prayed to quash and set aside the complaint being FIR No. 11191006250105 of 2025 registered with Bodakdev Police Station, Ahmedabad City, for the offences under Sections 351(1) of BNS and Section 67 A of the IT Act and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom. R/SCR.A/9822/2025 ORDER DATED: 16/07/2025 4. It is the case of the prosecution is that, the applicant was in love affair with respondent No.2 and during that time, the applicant had taken some videos and photographs of their personal moments and subsequently, sent some videos to the complainant as well as her brother and hurled abusive language. In this regard, FIR came to be lodged. 5. Learned advocates for the respective parties submitted that during the pendency of proceedings, the parties have settled the dispute amicably and pursuant to such mutual settlement, the original complainant has also filed an Affidavit, which is taken / placed on record. In the Affidavit, the original complainant has categorically stated that the dispute with the applicant/s has been resolved amicably and that she has no objection, if the present proceedings are quashed and set aside since there is no surviving grievance between them. 5.1 Learned counsel for the applicant on instructions has submitted that, now the applicant has no any objectionable material and also given assurance that he will not viral any such photographs or videos in future also. 6. Having heard learned advocates on both the sides and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of (i) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303, (ii) Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, reported in (2008) 4 SCC 582, (iii) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 31, (iv) Manoj Sharma Vs. State & Ors., reported in 2009 (1) GLH 190 and (v) Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2014 (2) Crime 67 (SC), in the opinion of this Court, the further continuation of criminal proceedings against the applicant/s in relation to the impugned FIR would cause unnecessary harassment to the applicant/s. Further, the continuance of trial pursuant to the mutual settlement arrived at between the parties would be a futile exercise. Hence, to secure the ends of justice, it would be R/SCR.A/9822/2025 ORDER DATED: 16/07/2025 appropriate to quash and set aside the impugned FIR and all consequential proceedings initiated in pursuance thereof under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.. 7. In the result, the application is allowed. The impugned complaint being FIR No. 11191006250105 of 2025 registered with Bodakdev Police Station, Ahmedabad City as well as all consequential proceedings initiated in pursuance thereof are hereby quashed and set aside qua the applicant/s herein. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted. If the applicant/s is/are in jail, the jail authority concerned is directed to release the applicant/s forthwith, if not required in connection with any other case. (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) SUCHIT Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: PATEL SUCHIT JAYESHBHAI(HC01083), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 17/07/2025 15:23:08