Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49957 (AP)

Yerramsetti Venkataramana, v. Manda Narayana Reddy

CRP/695/2021 · 2025-02-20

Nyapathy Vijay

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE i PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 695 OF 2021 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the Decree and Order dated 13^03.2020 passed in E.A.No. 15/2017 in E.P.No.17 of 2014 in O.S.No. 2 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional District Judge at Tanuku, West Godavari. i ; Between: 1. Yerramsetti Venkataramana, W/o. Venkata Subba Rao, aged about 38 years, R/o.Karravari Savarani,'Undrajavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. ‘ e - - 2. Narni Rama Krishna, S/o.Tatalu, aged about 38 years, R/o.Karravari Savaram, Undrajavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 3. Narni Sarathkumar, S/o. Tatalu, aged about 32 years, R/o.Karravari Savaram, Undrajavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. i i' i-- ■ ..Appellants/Claimants/Third Parties AND 1. Manda Narayana Reddy (died); 2. Manda Praveen Sujatha, W/o. late Narayana Reddy, aged about 37 years, R/o.Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. i 3. Manda Abhiram Kishore, $/'o,!r'late Narayana Reddy, aged about 23 years, R/o.Rajahmundry, EasfGodavari District. • I 4. Narni Tatalu, S/o. Rama Rao,; aged about 62 Savaram, Undrajavaram Manglal, West Godavari District. years, R/o.Karravari ■S ...Respondents a- ■ 5 \ lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section ISI.^GPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including auction in E.P.No. 17 of 2014 in O.S.No. 2 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional District Judge at Tanuku, West Godavari District pending disposal of above appeal. the Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Counsel for the Respondents; Sri T V Jaggi Reddy The Court made the following: >-s ; f I w THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 695 of 2021 ORDER: The present Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the Order, dated 13.03.2020, passed in E.A.No.15 of 2017 in E.P.No.17 of 2014 in O.S.No.2 of 2010, on the file of the iearned IV Additional District Judge, atTanuku, West 1. Godavari District. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue in the Revision Petition has been rendered infructuous in view 2. of the subsequent developments. Recording the said submission, the Civii Revision Petition is dismissed, infructuous. There shali be no order as to costs. As a sequei, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. 3. as Sd/- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTibN'pFFICER To, 1. The IV Additional District Judge, Tanuku, West Godavari District 2. One CC to Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri T V Jaggi Reddy/Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 5. Three CD Copies Stu TF HIGH COURT DATED:21/02/2025 ORDER CRP.No.695 of 2021 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS