APHC010852832016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION Between: Dwivedula Anudeep, State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P S RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 35244/2016 ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For Endowments The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 MRK,J W.P.No.35244 of 2016 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, seeking the following main relief : “ to issue a writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus (a) declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in issuing order vide RC.No.J1/107/2016, dt.25.09.2016 as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India (b) Direct the respondent No.3 to reinstate the petitioner in to service as Grade-3 Vratha Purohit forthwithin the interest of justice”. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.A.Priyanka, learned counsel representing Sri P.S.Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri T.Venu Gopal, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments jointly submitted that the petitioner is presently working as Grade-3 Vratha Purohit in Sri Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Swami Vari Devasthanam / 3rd respondent, as such, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 3. Recording the submission made by both the counsel, the instant Writ Petition is closed as the cause in the writ petition does not survive. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 25.09.2025 GRL 3 MRK,J W.P.No.35244 of 2016 172 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.35244 of 2016 Date: 25.09.2025 GRL