Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49943 (AP)

KARRA NARAIAH v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17560/2022 · 2025-11-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.17560 of 2022 APHC010270982022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17560 OF 2022 Between: 1. KARRA NARAIAH, S/O Karra Kotaiah, aged 43 years, R/o Narasareddy Palam, Kaligiri, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh-524224. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by it's Principal Secretary (Home Dept) Secretariat Buildings, At Amaravathi, Guntur dist, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kavali Division, SPSR Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Circle Inspector of Police, Kaligiri Mandal, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Station House Officer, of Kaligiri Police Station, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. G Veerendra Babu, S/o Not known, Aged 40 years, Occ Sub-Inspector of Police, Kavali Rural, SPSR Nellor Dist, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.17560 of 2022 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in-action of the respondents No 2 and 3 in initiation action against the respondent no 6 for his unlawful interference over the civil disputes and beating the petitioner in blue and black to settle the disputes with his kith and kin despite the petitioner made his complaint on 21.10.2020 duly enclosing all the medical certificates and wound certificates evidencing that the petitioner sustained injuries and the action of 6th respondent involving in the civil disputes is against the orders of this Hon'ble court in the case of W Sravani vs State Of AP in WP NO 12719 of 2020 dated 7-09-2020 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of Natural Justice and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to take action against the 6th respondent considering the report of the petitioner dated 21.10.2020 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.17560 of 2022 The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer: <…to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in-action of the respondents No 2 and 3 in initiation action against the respondent no 6 for his unlawful interference over the civil disputes and beating the petitioner in blue and black to settle the disputes with his kith and kin despite the petitioner made his complaint on 21.10.2020 duly enclosing all the medical certificates and wound certificates evidencing that the petitioner sustained injuries and the action of 6th respondent involving in the civil disputes is against the orders of this Hon'ble court in the case of W Sravani vs State Of AP in WP NO 12719 of 2020 dated 7-09-2020 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of Natural Justice and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to take action against the 6th respondent considering the report of the petitioner dated 21.10.2020..= 2. Heard Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are not taking action against the 6th respondent, though petitioner made a representation to that effect. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, brought to the notice of the Court that 3rd respondent has conducted enquiry into the allegations made against 6th respondent and found that they are not true. Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.17560 of 2022 5. Recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.11.2025 Dvs Dr.VJP,J W.P.No.17560 of 2022 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 160 WRIT PETITION NO: 17560 OF 2022 Date: 19.11.2025 Dvs