OMPRAKASH KUMAWAT SON OF SHRI RAMGOPAL KUMAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/7024/2025 · 2025-11-27
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49941 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49941 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7024/2025 Omprakash Kumawat Son Of Shri Ramgopal Kumawat, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 50, Radhakishanpura, Sikar, Udyog Nagar, District Sikar. ----Petitioner/complainant Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur
3. Superintendent Of Police, Sikar, District Sikar.
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Udyognagar (Sikar), District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP Mr. Devi Singh-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 27/11/2025
1. By way of filing the present criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for a issuing directions to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation in the impugned FIR No.669/2024 registered with the Police Station Udyognagar, Sikar. 2 Counsel for the petitioner submits that looking to the injury sustained by the petitioner, the offence under Sections 109 and 138 of BNS are found to be made out, but in-spite of the above, an FIR has been registered for petty offences. Counsel submits that the Police are helping the accused person(s), hence the
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-7024/2025] petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing this petition for the aforesaid purpose.
3. On the last occasion, this Court vide order dated 11.11.2025
directed the learned Public Prosecutor to call for the factual report of investigation conducted so far.
4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the factual report has been submitted by the SHO Police Station-Udyognagar, Sikar which indicates that after investigation, the charge sheet has been filed against the accused persons under Sections 126(2) and 115(2) of BNS before the Competent Court of Law. Hence, under these circumstances, no direction can be issued by this Court.
5. The petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate application for redressal of his grievance before the trial court at appropriate stage.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the present criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/48