Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4994 (MAD)

P.Ramamoorthy v. V.Balamurali

CMP(MD)/14071/2025 · 2026-03-05

M Jothiraman, N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.(MD)No.14071 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) Sr.No.70325 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN C.M.P.(MD)No.14071 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) Sr.No.70325 of 2025 P.Ramamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs 1.V.Balamurali 2. The Inspector General of Registration, Registration Department, Santhom High Road, Chennai - 600004. 2. The District Registrar, Sivagnagai, Sivagangai District. 3. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Thiruppuvanam, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER:- Petition filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, to grant leave to the petitioner to file the above said Writ Appeal against the order in W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2025 dated 25.02.2025 of this Court. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.14071 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) Sr.No.70325 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.Saravana Kumar For R1 : No appearance For R2 to R4 : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam Government Advocate ORDER (Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) This petition is filed to grant leave to file the above appeal against the order in W.P.(MD) No.4963 of 2025 dated 25.02.2025. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is said to be a purchaser of the land and according to him, the above order was obtained by suppressing several facts. The learned counsel also brought to the notice of this Court about the intention of the first respondent to get money from the purchasers by executing affidavit expressing his no objection. 3. Though notice has been sent to the first respondent, none has 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.14071 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) Sr.No.70325 of 2025 entered appearance. Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondents 2 to 4 and has no serious objection to the petition being allowed. 4. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the application and considering the nature of issue involved in this case and also considering the fact that the respondents 2 to 4 have not raised serious objection, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. Hence, leave is granted and this petition is ordered. [N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] 05.03.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes apd 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.(MD)No.14071 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) Sr.No.70325 of 2025 N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J. apd C.M.P.(MD)No.14071 of 2025 in W.A.(MD) Sr.No.70325 of 2025 05.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis