Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4994 (AP)

ATLA SUMAN v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/840/2025 · 2025-02-07

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010039692025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 840/2025 Between: Atla Suman and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. V ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 840/2025 ORDER The instant Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., 2023 (u/s.438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 5, seeking to release the Petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.76 of 2024 of Chittamuru Police Station, Tirupati District registered for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2), 109, 118(1) r/w 3(5) of BNSS. 2. Heard Sri V.Roopesh Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State/Respondent. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that this is the 4th anticipatory bail application preferred by the petitioners/A2 to A5. Learned Counsel would further submit that investigation is almost completed, the injuries suffered by the victim are simple in nature as per the wound Certificate. Learned Counsel finally prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the petition and would submit that this is not a fit case for anticipatory bail and prays for dismissal of the petition. 5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that liberty may be given to the petitioners to surrender before the concerned Court. 3 6. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material on record, since there are no changes of circumstances from the dismissal of the earlier bail application, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. In that view, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioners are at liberty to surrender before the concerned Court and move regular bail applications. On filing of such applications, the learned Judge is requested to dispose of the bail applications as expeditiously as possible preferably on the same day. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.02.2025 UPS 4 26 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.840 of 2025 Dt.07.02.2025 UPS