IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV^^^^ J/ H. MONDAY. THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT O O oc m O 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI A^PPEAL SUIT NO: 179 OF 207? Appeal filed under Section 96 R/W Order 41 Rule (1) of CPC praying that the High Court may be pleased to allow this appeal by setting aside the Judgment and Decree, dated 25.01.2022 passed in O.S.No.149 of 2014 the file of the XI Additional District Judge at Gudivada on Krishna District. Between: 1. Kotha Manjula Devi. W/o.Late Kakarala Poorna aged Gowrisankarapuram. Gudivada. Krishna District, 2. Kakarala Swathi. W/o.Nallamothu Chandra Rao. Hindu. R/o.Door No.9/330. Andhra Pradesh. 74 years. Retired Employee Sateesh Kumar. Hindu, aged 49 years. Employee. R/o.2879 Gray Hawk Normal IL 61761. United States of America, represented by her G.P.A. Holder Kotha Late Kakarala Poorna Chandra Rao Manjula Devi, W/o. Hindu, aged 74 years. Retired Employee, R/o.Door No.9/330. Gowrisankarapuram District. Andhra Pradesh. Gudivada, Krishna ...Appellants/Plaintiffs AND 1. Kakarala Sarath Babu, S/o.Late Krishna Murthy, Hindu, aged about 68 Enclave, Road No.2 L.V.Prasad Marg, Banjara Hills, Hyclerabad-500034, Telangana State. ' years. Working in Prasad Laboratories, Park View 2. Kakarala Leela, D/o.Late Krishna Murthy, Hindu Properties, R/o.Upstairs, Sai Baba Gari House, Pedaparupudi Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. Variganji Babu Rao, S/o.Late Biksham, aged about 70 years. Retired Employee, R/o.Near Vanthena, Bhushanagulla Village, Pedaparupudi Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. aged about 70 years Bhushanagulla Village ...Respondents/Defendants lA NO: 1 OF 2099 Petition filed under Section circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings Judgment and Decree dated 25.01.2022 151 CPC praying that in the pursuant to the passed in O.S.No.149 of 2014 Judge, Gudivada, Krishna on the file of the Court of the XI Additional District District pending disposal of the appeal suit. lA NO: 2 OF 2099 Petition filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151 CPC prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an ad-interim injunction against the respondents from alienating or creating any encumbrances over the plaint schedule property pending disposal of the appeal suit. Counsel for the Appellants Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri Pithani Chandra (No representation) Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar (No representation) :Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad Sekhara Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.2: - The Court made the following Judgment: w APHC010355042022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] U PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 179/2022 Between: Kotha Manjula Devi and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Kakarala Sarath Babu and Others ...RESPONDENT{S) \ Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.PITHANI CHANDRA SEKHARA REDDY 2.PSPSURESH KUMAR The Court made the following Judgment: Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the appellants appearing through Video Conference would submit that a Memo dated 01.05.2025 was filed before the Registry wherein it is stated that the first appellant died on 25.04.2024 and the second appellant is not intending to continue the Appeal. \L:m 1 2 Hence, the permission may be accorded to withdraw the present Appeal. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. None appeared for the respondents. 4. In that view of the matter, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATARAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The XI Additional District Judge, Gudivada records) 2. The Section Officer, VR Section, High court of Andhra Pradesh. 3. One CC to Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Pithani Chandra Sekhara Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri P.S.P.Suresh Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 6. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati Krishna District.(With at 7. Three CD Copies BSV GSC •a-,-.....- HIGH COURT DATED:05/05/2025 JUDGMENT AS.No.179 of 2022 2 2 JUL 2025 IS O « y-a Sectigiux^y ^•^sagATCBSg^ DISMISSING THE APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS