Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49933 (AP)

VEMULA AKHILA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25706/2025 · 2025-09-22

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010501712025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25706/2025 Between: 1. VEMULA AKHILA, D/O. VEMULA BALA VENKATA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, R/O. AKKIRAJ COLONY, NEAR BETHEL CHURCH, ATMAKUR MANDAL, NANDYALA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-518422. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN MADANAPALLE POLICE STATION ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Habeas Corpus declaring the action of Respondents, who, without any authority of law, have detained my mother and my father by names Vemula Jyothi, and Vemula Bala Venkata Swamy, R/o. Akkiraj 2 Colony, Near Bethel Church, Atmakur Mandal, Nandyala District- 518422 were detained for the past 2 days without the registration of any crime or any reason or justification. The said actions are arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Articles 14,19, 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent police authorities to produce the detenues before this Honble Court forthwith and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ALLA TARUN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 3 The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the first detenu had been remanded to judicial custody by way of a remand order while the second detenu has not been detained. 2. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 23.09.2025 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25706/2025 Date: 23.09.2025 KA