Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49932 (AP)

GUDIBANDA MURALI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/34/2025 · 2025-02-05

K Sreenivasa Reddy

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

`-. lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FC€.-:i`¥idg': TUESDAY, THE F!FTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: +q` THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO latfeife lANo.1 OF2025 lN CRLP NO: 34 OF 2025 Between: 1. Gudibanda Murali, S/o.Siva Sankara Aged about 26 years, Student, R/o.D.No.56/96-A, Battu Street, Rayachoty, Rayachoty Mandal, Annamayya District. 2. Shariyaz Begum, W/o.Moulali, Aged about 40 years. Employee in i Mepma Department, Rayachoty, Rayachoty Mandal, Annamayya `.I District. 3. Gudibanda Siva Sankara, , S/o.Ramachandraiah, Aged about 60 years. Employee as MPDO, Pileru, R/o.D.NO.56/96-A, Battu Street, Rayachoty, Rayachoty Mandal, Annamayya District. 4. Vandadi Venkateswarlu, S/o.Gurrappa, Aged about 57 years. Business, R/o.Lakshmipuram, Galiveedu Road, Rayachoty, Rayachoty Mandal, Annamayya District. ...Petitioners/Accused No.2 to 5 AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P a{ Amaravathi. ...Respondent Counsel forthe Petitioners : SRI KOGANTI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent : Asst PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Petition under Section 483 (1) of BNSS, 2023 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to relax, the condition imposed on the petitioners while granting Anticipatory Bail on 06.02.2025 in Crl P No 34 of 2025, Pending disposal of CRLP No. 34 of 2025, on the file of the High Court. The court while directing issue of notice {o the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case). ORDER [fHeard the learned counsel ''for the petitioners and the learned Assistant public prosecutor. The learned Assistant-Public Prosecutor submits that the charge sheet is not yet filed. \ For the reaso-ns mentioned in.1:h`e petition,1:he Order passed by the ]`earned single Judge in Cr[.P. No. 34 of 2025, dated 06.02.2025, at paragraph No. 5 (iii); directing the petitioners shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned once a week, i.e., every Saturday between 10:00 a[m. and 5:00 p.m|, till filing pf charge sheet, is modified. The petitioners shall now appear before 1:he Station House Officer Concerned as and when required| Accordingly, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is ordered." //TRU E CO PY// Sd/-K.J.RAJA BABU ASSIST#EGISTRAR .SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The SHO, Rayachoty U/G Police Station, Annamayya District. 2. One CC to SRl. KOGANTI NAGESWARA RAO Advocate [OPUC] i 3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh.[OUT] 4. One spare copy HIGH COURT Dr.YLR, J DATED : 05/08/2025 I- ORDER iA NO.1 OF 2025 lN CRLP.No.34 of 2025 DIRECTION