Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49931 (RAJ)

VIVEK S/O SUMERSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15198/2025 · 2025-11-19

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46628] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15198/2025 Vivek S/o Sumersingh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Mukundpura, Police Station Sadar Hindauncity At Present R/o Sadhna Colony, Police Station Naimandi Hindauncity, District Karauli (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Hindaun City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Timan Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 19/11/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.430/2025 registered at Police Station New Mandi (Hindaun), District-Karauli for offences under Section 140(3) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and that the present FIR has been lodged against him falsely. The injuries sustained by the injured-Lalit, are all simple in nature. The petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest. The trial of the case may [2025:RJ-JP:46628] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15198/2025] take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Vivek S/o Sumersingh shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for her appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/29