GIRPARE ALIAS SUMIT NAMTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./984/2025 · 2025-02-13
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4993 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4993 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.984 of 2025
------
1. Girpare @ Sumit Namta aged about 21 years son of Gopi Namta.
2. Hablu @ Hablu Lohar @ Sumit Namta aged about 24 years son of Gopi Namta.
3. Gopal Namata @ Golu aged about 32 years son of Sikandar Namata. All resident of Kumhar Para, New Baradwari, P.O.- Sakchi, P.S.- Sitaramdera, District- East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur).
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Nawin Kumar Singh, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-13-02-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.179 of 2024 instituted under Sections 191(2)/191(3)/329/352/115(2)/ 109/324(2)/351(2)/303(2) of the B.N.S., the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being the members of an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons, attempted to murder members of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the allegation of causing grievous injury upon the informant, is against Bhodu. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.179 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/