\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) Nos: 51 OF 2025. 57 OF 2025 AND 68 OF 2025 FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO. 51 OF 2025: APHC010124462025 Appeal filed under section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, aggrieved by the Common Decree and Order dated 26.12.2024, passed in F.C.O.P. No. 55 of 2014 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam. Between: Boddepalli Tejeswara Rao, S/o. Akkanna Akkulu, Hindu, Aged 51 Years, Occ: Railway Trackman, D.No. 19-160, Chandra Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. ...Appellant/Petitioner in FCOP No.55 of 2014 AND Boddepalli Rajyalakshrhi @ Neelima, W/o. B.Tejeswara Rao, D/o. Peddada Govinda Rao, Hindu, aged around 41 years, Occ: House Wife, Residing Seepanivariveedhi, Krishnapuram Village, Amudalavalasa Mandal, Srikakularn District. Cell- 7095753758 ...Respondent/Respondent in FCOP No.55 of 2014 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Decree and Common Order in F.C.O.P.No.55 of 2014 on the file of the Court of Judge, Additional Family Court at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Appellant/Petitioner, to apply for and ensure the issuance of a health card for the Respondent, thereby enabling her to avail all medical benefits and facilities entitled to the lawful wedded wife of a railway employee forthwith to provide the Respondent with all entitled railway pass benefits per the rules and regulations applicable to dependent family members of railway employees. as Counsel for the Appellant: Sri G.V.S.Kishore Kumar Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Arun Showri.G FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCAt NO. 57 OF 2025: APHC010124492025 B Appeal filed under section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, aggrieved by the Common Decree and Order dated 26.12.2024, passed in FCOP No. 509 of 2019 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam. 7 Between: Boddepalli Tejeswara Rao, S/o. Akkanna @ Akkulu, Hindu, Aged 51 Years, Occ: Railway Trackman, D.No. 19-160, Chandra Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. ...Appellant/Petitioner in FCOP No.509 of 2019 AND Boddepalli Rajyalakshmi @ Neelima, W/o. B.Tejeswara Rao, D/o. Peddada Govinda Rao, Hindu, aged around 41 years, Occ: House Wife, Residing Seepanivariveedhi, Krishnapuram Village, Amudalavalasa Mandal, Srikakularn District. Cell- 7095753758 ...Respondent/Respondent in FCOP No.509 of 2019 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Common Decree and Order dated 26.12.2024 passed in F.C.O.P. No. 509 of 2019 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri G.V.S.Kishore Kumar Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Arun Showri.G. FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO. 68 OF 2025: APHC010203092025 EPS a- Appeal filed under section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, aggrieved by the Common Decree and Order dated 26.12.2024, passed in F.C.O.P. No. 215 of 2016 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam. Between: Boddepalli Tejeswara Rao, S/o. Akkanna @ Akkulu, Hindu, Aged 51 Years, Occ; Railway Trackman, D.No.19-160, Chandra Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatham District. ...Appellant/Petitionerin FCOP No.215of 2016 AND Boddepalli Rajyalakshmi @ Neelima, W/o. B.Tejeswara Rao, D/o. Peddada Govinda Rao, Hindu, aged around 41 years, Occ: House Wife, Residing Seepanivariveedhi, Krishnapuram Village, Amudalavalasa Mandal, Srikakularn District. Cell- 7095753758 ...Respondent/Respondent in FCOP No.215 of 2016 lA NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in sijpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Decree and Common Order in FCOP 215 of 2016 the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. on Counsel for the Appellant: Sri G.V.S.Kishore Kumar Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Arun Showri.G. The Court made the following order: '0^ / APHC010124462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 51/2025 Between: 1.BODDEPALLI TEJESWARA RAO,, S/0. AKKANNA @ AKKULU, HINDU, AGED 51 YEARS, OCC- RAILWAY TRACKMAN, D.NO. 19- 160, CHANDRA NAGAR, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1.BODDEPALLI RAJYALAKSHMI NEELIMA, W/o B. Tejeswara Rao, D/o Peddada Govinda Rao, Hindu, aged around 41 years, Occ- House Wife, Residing Seepanivariveedhi, Krishnapuram Village, Amudalavalasa Mandal, Srikakularn District. Cell- 7095753758 ...RESPONDENT against ordersmay be urged at the time of the hearing main appeal the Honorable Court may be pleased to set aside the dismissal of the Decree and Common Order in FCOP No. 55/2014 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam dt 26th December,2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the Decree and Common Order in FCOP 55/2014 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Appeal under section Petition under Section 151 opr^ ^ the affidavit filed in support of the n® “''"'"^'ances stated y be pleased to direct the ADDellant/D rr’ Court may be pleased members of railway employees anTpasf *° ^^Pendent efmHy \ Counsel for the Appellant: 1-G VS KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: ■J -ARUN SHOWRI G fAMILY COURT APPc^, IPCA) NO: 57/?f)9i; Between; ’ 'A^Fn^s^'-''' ■^^-^ESWARA aged 51 YEARS, CHANDRA NAGAR RAO, S/0. OCC RAILWAY gopalapatnam AK^NNA @ AKKULU, HINDU trackman, D.NO. 19-16o’ VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. -appellant AND Residing SeepanivariveedW ’ Krisl °P‘' ^'°Pse Wife Mandal, Srikakulam District. Cell 7095753T58 Appeal under section -RESPONDENT dismissal of the Decrep against orderspleased to set pqIHo -c„, „ ss S"™z "“f s; December,2024. at Wsakhapatnam dt 26th jANO: 1 OF ?n9i; Petition under Section 151 rpr r,. ■ in the affidavit filed in support of the petftion^m ^ circumstances stated pleased to suspend the Common n ^ Court may be pleased , passed of Additionai Famiiy Court and pass Jk 3 Counsel for the Appellant: 1.G VS KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1.ARUNSHOWRI G / FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 68/2025 Between: 1.BODDEPALLI TEJESWARA RAO, S/0. AKKANNA @ AKKULU, HINDU, AGED 51 YEARS, OCC- RAILWAY TRACKMAN, D.NO. 19-160, CHANDRA NAGAR, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1.BODDEPALLI RAJYALAKSHMI NEELIMA, W/o B. Tejeswara Rao, D/o Peddada Govinda Rao, Hindu, aged around 41 years, Occ- House Wife, Residing Seepanivariveedhi, Krishnapuram Village, Amudalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District. Cell- 7095753758 ...RESPONDENT against ordersThe Appellant above named respectfully submits this Memorandum of Family Court Appeal to this Honble Court aggrieved by the Common Decree and Order dated 26.12.2016 passed in F.C.O.P. Nos. 215/2016 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh dated 26th day of December, 2024, lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to condone the delay of one (1) day in filing the above appeal FCA.No. 68/25 and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be Pleased to condone the delay of (45) days in representingFCA No. 68 of 2025 and pass Appeal under section T 4 lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the Decree Passed in FCOP No. 215 of 2016 dated 26.12.2024 and to lA NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the Decree and Common Order in FCOP 215/2016 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1.G VS KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1.ARUNSHOWRI G The Court made the following: \ pass 5 - /- THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND / & / THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos.51, 57 & 68 of 2025 COMMON JUDGMENTifPer Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Hari Haranadha Sarma) In continuation of the understanding stated by both parties 15.10.2025, affidavits of both parties, husband-Sri Boddepalli Tejeswara Rao and wife-Smt. Boddepalli Rajyalakshmi Neelima are filed. on 2. Learned counsel for both sides are present. The contents of the affidavit of the respective parties would reveal that the compromise arrived at is unconditional on the part of both parties and they have decided to reside together as husband and wife under the same roof. The husband has expressed that he is ready and willing to take his wife to the matrimonial home and she has agreed to resume conjugal life. 3. \ \ / 4. Both parties expressed that the agreement is unconditional and the husband is ready to reside with the wife under the same roof and the wife has also agreed to resume the conjugal life with immediate effect. 5. Both parties with one voice submitted that F.C.A.Nos.51, 57 & 68 of 2025 may be disposed of, recording the compromise and the factum of reunion. 6 6. Pursuant to the observations dated 15.10.2025, exemption for appearance of the parties was accorded. Both the parties are identified by their respective counsel and the respective affidavits of both parties endorsed by both counsel are placed on record in the presence of both counsel. The Identification cards i.e. Aadhar Cards of the respective parties duly attested by learned counsel for parties shall form part of the record. \ 7. In view of reunion and orders are necessary in these appeals. compromise between both parties, no further 8. Accordingly, these appeals are disposed of, recording the settlement, shall be no order as to costs. There As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER \ To, 1. The Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. (With Records, if any) One CC to Sri G.V.S.Kishore Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Arun Showri.G., Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Two CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. GPC vna T HIGH COURT DATED; 17/10/2025 COMMON JUDGEMENT + DECREE FCA Nos. 51 OF 2025, 57 OF 2025 & 68 OF 2025 0 3 NOV 2025 urrentSectionxV^ DISPOSING OF THESE FAMILY COURT appeals \ APHC010124492025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO. 57 OF 2025: Between: Boddepalli Tejeswara Rao, S/o. Akkanna Akkulu, Hindu, Aged 51 Years, Occ; Railway Trackman, D.No.19-160, Chandra Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhap^tnarn District. ...Appellant/Petitioner in FCOP No.55 of 2014 T. and Boddepalli Rajyalakshmi @ Neelima, W/o. B.Tejeswara Rao, D/o. Peddada Govinda Rao, Hindu, aged around 41 years, Occ: House Wife, Residing Seepanivariveedhi, Krishnapuram Village, Amudalavalasa Mandal, Srikakularn Distffdt'Cell-7095753758 ...Respondent/Respondent in FCOP No.55 of 2014 Appeal filed under section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, aggrieved by the Common Decree and Orderdated 26.12.2024, passed in F.C.O.P. No. 509 of 2019 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Trial Court and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of Sri G.V.S.Kishore Kumar, Advocate for Appellant & Sri G.Arun Showri, Advocate for Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That appeal be and hereby is disposed of recording the settlement, in view of the reunion and compromise between the both parties. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Two CD Copies GPC HIGH COURT \ DATED: 17/10/2025 DECREE FCA Nos. 57 OF 2025 ^ 0 3 NOV 2025 rrentSectii 3- Co DISPOSING OF THIS FAMILY COURT APPEAL APHC010124462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO. 51 OF 2025: Between; Boddepalli Tejeswara Rao, S/o. Akkanna @ Akkulu, Hindu, Aged 51 Years, Occ: Railway Trackman, D.No.19-160, Chandra Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. ...Appellant/Petitioner in FCOP No.55 of 2014 AND Boddepalli Rajyalakshmi (g Neelima, W/o. B.Tejeswara Rao, D/o. Peddada Govinda Rao, Hindu, aged around 41 years, Occ; House Wife, Residing Seepanivariveedhi, Krishnapuram Village, Amudalavalasa Mandal, Srikakularn District. Cell- 7095753758 ...Respondent/Respondent In FCOP No.55 of 2014 Appeal filed under section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, aggrieved by the Common Decree and Order dated 26.12.2024, passed in F.C.O.P. No. 55 of 2014 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam. This appeal coming on for bearing and upon perusing the grounds of ‘appeal, the Order and Decree of the Trial Court and material papers in the ‘ ^ petition and upon hearing arguments of Sri G.V.S.Kishore Kumar, Advocate for Appellant & Sri G.Arun Showri, Advocate for Respondent. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: That appeal be and hereby is disposed of recording the settlement, in view of the reunion and compromise between the both parties. That there shall be no order as to costs. 1. 2. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Two CD Copies 2. GPC vna ' ^ HIGH COURT DATED: 17/10/2025 DECREE FCA Nos. 51 OF 2025 t 0 3 NOV 2025 ntSectioj^^^ fri-. / Cc DISPOSING OF THIS FAMILY COURT APPEAL / o APHC010203092025 '\i? IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD|^H| AT AMARAVATI !3 ^ i' >1 c?# W V-,:; A' FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO. 68 OF 2025: Between: Boddepalli Tejeswara Rao, S/o. Akkanna @ Akkulu, Hindu, Aged 51 Years, Occ: Railway Trackman, D.No.19-160, Chandra Nagar, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. ...Appellant/Petitioner in FCOP No.55 of 2014 AND Boddepalli Rajyalakshmi @ Neelima, W/o. B.Tejeswara Rao, D/o. Peddada Govinda Rao, Hindu, aged around 41 years, Occ: House Wife, Residing Seepanivariveedhi, Krishnapuram Village, Amudalavalasa Mandal, Srikakularn Districtr Cell- 7095753758 ...Respondent/Respondent in FCOP No.55 of 2014 Appeal filed under section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, aggrieved by the Common Decree and Order dated 26.12.2024, passed in F.C.O.P. No. 215 of 2016 on the file of the Court of Additional Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Trial Court and material papers in the / / / petition and upon hearing arguments of Sri G.V.S.Kishore Kumar, Advocate W/ for Appellant & Sri G.Arun Showri, Advocate for Respondent. this court doth order AND DECREE: 1. That appeal be and hereby is disposed of recording the settlement, in view of the reunion and compromise between the both parties. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Family Court Judge at Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. Two CD Copies GPC vna ■y HIGH COURT DATED: 17/10/2025 \ decree FCA Nos. 68 OF 2025 .•V'J-. C3', 0 3 NOV 2025 o Co' rrentSectionXW S>. DISPOSING OF THIS family court appeal