Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49924 (BOM)

AMOL S/O. SURESHRAO DAHAKEY v. THE VIDHARBHA IRRIGATION DEV. COOP., THR. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, YAVATMAL AND ANR.

WP/2353/2025 · 2025-05-08

Shri Nitin W Sambre, Vrushali V Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CAW1225-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.1225/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2353/2025 (D) (AMOL SURESH DAHAKEY VERSUS V.I.D.C., YAVATMAL & ANOTHER) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders. Shri H.D. Marathe, counsel for the applicant-respondent no.1. Shri Tejas Deshpande, counsel for the non-applicant/petitioner. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. D ATE : JULY 07, 2025 P. C. Heard. 2. Vide oral judgment dated May 08, 2025, this Court had allowed the writ petition and had made the Rule absolute in terms of Prayer Clause (a) of the writ petition. Our oral judgment is quite clear on the issue of relief granted in favour of the petitioner. The difficulty that is faced by the applicant-original respondent no.1 in the matter of acceptance of Earnest Money Deposit through offline mode can very well be handled by them as we have not placed any embargo on their rights. 3. In view of above, we see no reason to issue any further directions. The civil application is rejected and the same stands disposed of. (VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) APTE 2025:BHC-NAG:6351-DB