APHC010456742025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23856/2025 Between: KAPUSETTI SATYANARAYANA, S/O.LATE SAMUDRALU AGED 46 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION R/O.D.NO.1-183/1, KOMATIGUNTA VILLAGE KALLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, BHIMAVARAM ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AKIVEEDU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLA POLICE STATION, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AP 6. THE SEESALI GRAMPANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY SEESALI VILLAGE, KALLA MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AP 7. BONAM BHAGYA SRI, W/O.B.SIVA PENTAYYA @ SIVA KUMAR AGED 38 YEARS, OCC. SARPANCH KOMATIGUNTA GRAMPANCHAYAT KALLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 8. B SIVA PENTAYYA SIVA KUMAR, S/O.B.V.SATYANARAYANA, AGED 42 YEARS OCC CULTIVATION, R/O.KOMATIGUNTA VILLAGE KALLA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT, AP 9. YERUBANDI RAMANJANEYULU, S/O.Y.VENKANNA, AGED 47 YEARS OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.KOMATIGUNTA VILLAGE KALLA MANDAL, W.G.DISTRICT, AP ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. YASWANTH GADE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 7 in interfering with petitioners possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac.1.34 cents in R.S.No.5/1 Seesali Village, Kalla Mandal, West Godavari District and making efforts to obstruct him from passing through the passage situated towards the Western Side of my land in R.S.No.5/1 at the behest of the Respondents 8 and 9 without any manner of right or authority as highly illegal, arbitrary, excessive of powers, violative of Art. 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 7 not to interfere with his possession and enjoyment of the above said property and to have an access to the said property from the existing passage.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, on receipt of call from 112, the Police have visited the disputed site and had take steps for preventing any untoward incidents, but they are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. It is further submitted that there is also a G.D entry made in the Police Station regarding receipt of the said phone call. 3. Sri Yaswanth Gade, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:25.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23856 of 2025 Dt.25.09.2025 Dinesh