Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49912 (RAJ)

NAGENDRA BENIWAL @ NIKKI S/O SH. BALWANT BENIWAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15924/2025 · 2025-12-03

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49058] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15924/2025 Nagendra Beniwal @ Nikki S/o Sh. Balwant Beniwal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jaat Ki Sarai Hindon City Police Station Hindon City Kotwali District Karauli. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain with Mr. Durgesh Kumar Jangid For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/12/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.284/2024 registered at Police Station Gonvindgarh (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur Rural for offence under Sections 126(2), 109(2), 309(6), 311 of BNS and Sections 3/25, 5/27 of Arms Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in FIR. No Test Identification Parade was conducted. He further submits that except co-accused Jai Prakash Yadav @JP and Chandradev Devendra other accused were enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.10.2025. The [2025:RJ-JP:49058] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15924/2025] charge-sheet has been filed. He further averred that petitioner is behind the bars since 29.10.2025 without any criminal past, and the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Nagendra Beniwal @ Nikki, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/130