Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49911 (AP)

NAKKA THOMAS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25445/2025 · 2025-09-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010481942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25445/2025 Between: 1. NAKKA THOMAS, S/O. NAKKA YOBU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. GOGULAPADU VILLAGE, ROMPICHERLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P., 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET RURAL POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. NAKKA SUNDARA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O. NARASARAOPET TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4THRespondent police 2 personal in registering an FIR, completing the investigation and filing of charge sheet against the criminal complaint lodged by the petitioner herein on 2r-d21.07.2025 respondent vide Grievance No. PLND202507214280 and consequently direct the 2ND respondent to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner 21.07.2025 is illegal and arbitrary and violation of Art.21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to register an FIR, complete the investigation and file charge sheet in a fixed time frame and pass such other or further orders as are deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to register an FIR against the 5TH respondent representations dated 21.07.2025 vide Grievance No. PLND202507214280, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMESH BABU NELATURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25445 OF 2025 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 4TH Respondent police personal in registering an FIR completing the investigation and filing of charge sheet against the criminal complaint lodged by the petitioner herein on 21.07.2025 before 2nd respondent vide Grievance No.PLND202507214280 and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner 21.07.2025 is illegal and arbitrary and violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to register an FIR complete the investigation and file charge sheet in a fixed time frame and pass..” 2. Heard Sri N.Ramesh Babu, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that police are not taking any action against the representation dated 21.07.2025 given by the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that a crime has been registered against the unofficial respondent and no further orders are required to be passed in this matter. 5. Recording the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.09.2025 SNI 5 598 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25445 OF 2025 22.09.2025 SNI