Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4991 (RAJ)

AVINASH KUMAR YADAV S/O SHRI DHARM DEV YADAV v. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/1348/2025 · 2025-02-21

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:7921] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1348/2025 Avinash Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Dharm Dev Yadav, Aged About 36 Years, R/o B-152/101, Marigold Ashadeep Society Neemrana District-Kotputli-Behror. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited through Chairman Vidyut Bhawan Jan Path Jyoti Nagar Jaipur (Rajasthan). 302005. 2. Secretary (Administration) Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan Jan Path Jyoti Nagar Jaipur (Rajasthan). 302005 3. Assistant Engineer (O And M), Jaipur Discom, Umrain, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akshay Dutt Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 21/02/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation within a period of 7 days before the Competent Authority. 2. Heard. 3. This Court directs Respondent No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same within a period of 15 days, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. [2025:RJ-JP:7921] (2 of 2) [CW-1348/2025] 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). 4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/184