[2025:RJ-JP:45077] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12726/2025 Anil @ Batoli S/o Murarilal, R/o Shankarpur, Police Station Balghat, District Gangapur City (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa, District Dausa) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 10/11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.107/2024 registered at Police Station Mahua, District Dausa for offence under Section 143, 364-A, 384, 307 IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that main allegation in the FIR is against Lakhan Singh who has been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 10.09.2024. He argued that other co-accused Dimple has been enlarged on 22.5.2025 by this Bench, Rinku on 26.11.2024. the case of the present petitioner is akin to that of co-accused. He again submits that though the petitioner has history of 18 cases but in all cases he has been bailed out. The petitioner is behind the bars since 19.09.2024 and charge-sheet has been filed. The [2025:RJ-JP:45077] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12726/2025] trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Anil @ Batoli S/o Murarilal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Police Station Mahua, District Dausa in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to [2025:RJ-JP:45077] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12726/2025] immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg /128