Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49909 (ALL)

JAI PRAKASH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/48002/2017 · 2025-08-13

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:138834 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 48002 of 2017 Petitioner :- Jai Prakash Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mritunjay Mohan Sahai Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar Tyagi, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri M.M. Sahai, learned counsel for respondents. 2. The dispute in this writ petition is only in regard to date of birth of petitioner. 3. It is not disputed that at one stage in contempt proceedings, petitioner has declared his birth year as 1940. An explanation is mentioned that it was based on incorrect birth year mentioned in Voter ID Card which was later on corrected. 4. The respondents have come up with a case that there is no document in records about date and year of birth of petitioner since he was a daily wager. 5. Petitioner has not taken pain to submit any document subsequent to impugned order and he has approached this Court after about 3 years and since it is a disputed fact, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that in case petitioner is able to show document duly verified about his date of birth, without being influenced by impugned order, the respondents will take all endeavour to consider it and will comply the order passed by Labour Court as upheld up to Supreme Court in favour of petitioner. Order Date :- 14.8.2025 N. Sinha Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad