CWP-12496-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 131 LUXMI DEV STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The mandamus directing the respondent grades to the 2016, with effe 2. Learned counsel for the herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner decide the pending specified period. 3. 4. accepts notice on behalf of the respondents representation, dated respondent/Director, order in accordance with law within 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: VI Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Rohit Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, i directing the respondent/Departm petitioner in terms of the Hary fect from 01.12.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this petitioner will be satisfied in case second pending representation, dated 05 specified period. Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State , dated 05.02.2025, will be decided by Director, Elementary Education, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12496-2025 Date of Decision: 05.04.2025 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA inter alia, seeking a writ of ment to release the third ACP yana Civil Service ACP Rules, petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this second respondent is directed to 5.02.2025, Annexure P-3, in a Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, /State and submits that the pending will be decided by the second by passing a speaking/reasoned a period of three months. seeking a writ of P , submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this is directed to , in a , the pending second /reasoned Aman Dua 2025.05.05 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-12496-2025 5. petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. 7. officer concerned shall pay costs of 05.04.2025 Ad 2025 -2- In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No rned counsel for the In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.05.05 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document