- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16181-DB CCC No. 100354 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100354 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SHRI. IMAMJAFAR, S/O ABDULRESHAMAN BEPARI AGE. 46 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO.143-A, SECTOR NO.14, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOTE-587103, TQ.& DIST. BAGALKOTE. NOW R/O. SECTOR NO.71, PLOT NO.B-90, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOTE-587103, TQ. & DIST. BAGALKOTE. &COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. PRUTHVI K.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHANDRAHAS M. BANDI AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16181-DB CCC No. 100354 of 2025 AUTHORITY, BAGALKOTE-587103, TQ. & DIST. BAGALKOTE. 2. NAVEEN PRASAD KATTIMANI AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. THE REHABILITATION OFFICER, BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BAGALKOTE-587103, TQ. & DIST. BAGALKOTE. &ACCUSED 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD-580011. &PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SANJAY CHANAL, ADVOCATE FOR A2) SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR PROFORMA RESPONDENT) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO AWARD PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT TO THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 CONTEMNORS FOR WILLFUL DIS-OBEDIENCE AND BREACH OF DIRECTION/ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON9BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.100197/2025 (GM-RES) DATED 18/8/2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY & ETC. THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16181-DB CCC No. 100354 of 2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) Heard Sri. Pruthvi K.S., learned counsel for the complainant, and Sri. Sanjay Chanal, learned counsel, who appears and takes notice for accused Nos.1 and 2. 2. This Court, by order dated 18.08.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.100197/2025, directed the respondents/accused Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 30.12.2024 (Annexure-G to the writ petition) and pass necessary orders. 3. Learned counsel Sri. Sanjay Chanal, for respondents/accused Nos.1 and 2 files affidavit, dated 21.11.2025, of accused No.2 enclosing an order dated 17.11.2025 along with <Hakku Patra= dated 29.04.2024. The affidavit is taken on record. The affidavit would indicate that the representation of the complainant is considered and order is passed. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel for the complainant. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16181-DB CCC No. 100354 of 2025 4. In view of the above, we are of considered opinion that there is substantial compliance of the directions issued by this Court in W.P. No.100197 of 2025 vide order 18.08.2025. Hence, further contempt proceedings dropped. Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of as not surviving for consideration. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE KMS, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 19