Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49898 (ALL)

RAMJI YADAV v. STATE OF U.P THRU SECRETARY HOME GOVT. UP. LKNW.

ABAIL/19571/2021 · 2025-09-23

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 19571 of 2021 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Sri Shiv Kumar Pal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Santosh Nigam, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent are present. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in F.I.R./Case Crime No.32A of 2006, under Sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 218, 120-B/34 I.P.C. and Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, Police Station Dubhar, District Ballia, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous and therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous. 4. Learned A.G.A. is having no objection. 5. In view of the above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous. September 24, 2025 Zafar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sameer Jain,J.) Ramji Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru Secretary Home Govt. Up. Lknw. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ZAFAR ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad