APHC010287402023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14783/2023 Between: 1. J ESWARAIAH, S/O. LATE. J. RAJASEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO 32/420, GUTTAKINDAPALLI, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETRIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTHI, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DHARMAVARAM I TOWN POLICE STATION, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DHARMAVARAM I TOWN POLICE STATION, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 6. RANGANA ASWARTHANARAYANA, S/O. LATE. RANGANA VENKATESULU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 11/128, THOGARA VEEDHI, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATHY SAI DISTRICT-515671. 7. G ESWAR REDDY, S/O. G.CHENNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 2 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 4-55, SIVANAGAR, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT-515671 8. G RAJASEKHAR REDDY, S/O. G. ESWAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 4-55, SIVANAGAR, DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT-515671. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK MEERAVALI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14783 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 2 in not taking any action against the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 who are interfering in Money dispute/civil dispute in between the petitioner and Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 in repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and detaining him in the Police Station and threatening and with a warning that they will register a non-bailable cases against the petitioner at the behest and influence of the Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14, 21 and 300-A of The Constitution of India and contrary to the police Standing Orders. and consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 86 5 not to call the petitioner to the police Station and not to interfere in the personal life and liberty of the petitioner…= 2. Heard Sri Shaik Meeravali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering in the money disputes and repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station at the behest of the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the police are not calling the petitioner to the police station 4 relating to money transactions between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents and no crime has been registered against the petitioner. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 10.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 14783 of 2023 Dated.10.12.2025 UPS 250