THE STATE OF KARNATAKA v. AJMAL ALIAS MOHAMMAD AJMAL S/O MOHAMMAD JABEER
CRL.P/102725/2025 · 2025-11-24
S Rachaiah
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49880 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49880 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16247 CRL.P No. 102725 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.102725 OF 2025 (439(2)(Cr.PC)/483(3)(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT KARWAR.
2.
THE POLICE INSPECTOR, KADRA CIRCLE, CHITTAKULA POLICE STATION, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT, THROUGH ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH. &PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRAVEENA Y.DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP)
AND:
1.
AJMAL @ MOHAMMAD AJMAL S/O. MOHAMMAD JABEER, AGE. 25 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. MEHANDARPUR, POORNIYA DISTRICT, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF RANIPUTRA STATION, BIHAR, AADHAR CARD NO.829694889070.
2.
MASUM S/O. MANJOOR, AGE. 24 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. MEHANDARPUR, POORNIYA DISTRICT, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF RANIPUTRA STATION, BIHAR, AADHAR CARD NO.2522 2932 6236. &RESPONDENTS
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 (2) OF CR.P.C. (483 (3) OF BNSS), PRAYING TO, PASS AN ORDER UNDER SECTION 483 AND WITH DIRECTION TO ARREST THE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED AND SUBJECT THEM TO JUDICIAL CUSTODY BY CANCELING THE
ORDER DATED 25.11.2024 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.410/2024 BY PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR AND ETC.,.
Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16247 CRL.P No. 102725 of 2025
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH)
Though, one week time was granted as a last chance for compliance of office objections by
order dated 05.11.2025, office objections are not complied, failing which, the petition was ordered to be posted for dismissal. Office objections are not complied. In view of the above, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (S.RACHAIAH) JUDGE
PJ/CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51