HANAMANTAGOUDA S/O GOUDAPPAGOUDA PATIL v. SMT.PARWATEWWA W/IO MAHADEVPPA NADUVINAMANI
RFA/100327/2019 · 2025-06-24
R Nataraj, Rajesh Rai K
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49879 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49879 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7984-DB RFA No. 100327 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100327 OF 2019 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
1. HANAMANTAGOUDA S/O. GOUDAPPAGOUDA PATIL @ MALAGOUDAR @ GOUDAR, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HULLIKERI, BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587101.
2.
SHIVAYOGI S/O. HANAMANTAGOUDA PATIL @ MALAGOUDAR @ GOUDAR, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGREICULTURE, R/O. HULLIKERI, BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587101.
3.
GURUNATH S/O. HANAMANTAGOUDA PATIL @ MALAGOUDAR @ GOUDAR, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGREICULTURE, R/O. HULLIKERI, BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT-587101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B.HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. PARWATEWWA W/O. MAHADEVPPA NADUVINAMANI, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. VEERABHADRESHWAR NAGAR, RAMADURG, DIST: BELAGAVI-590002.
2.
SMT. PREMA W/O. MALLIKARJUN GONDI AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.06.26 10:16:55 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7984-DB RFA No. 100327 of 2019
R/O. C/O. M.B. GONDI. SUREBAN, TAL: RAMADURG, DIST: BELAGAVI-590002.
3.
DAVALMALEEK S/O. MASHAKSAB FAREED AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MADABHAVI, TAL: BIJAPUR, DIST: BIJAPUR-587101.
4.
RUDRAPPA S/O. SAGARAPPA KURI AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. BUDNI B.K., TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587101.
5.
SMT. SHANTAWWA W/O. DUSENGAPPA KOLAR AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. BUDNI B.K., TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587101.
6.
HANAMANT S/O. GADDEPPA KITTALI AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. HULLIKERI, BADAMI, DIST. BAGALKOT-587101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R.K.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. NARAYAN G.RASALKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5 AND R6;
NOTICE TO R2, R3 AND R4 ARE SERVED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.01.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.56/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, BADAMI, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7984-DB RFA No. 100327 of 2019
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.NATARAJ)
Learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for contesting respondents No.1, 5 and 6 submit that the parties have reported settlement in FDP.No.9/2019 and the final decree in terms of the compromise is ordered. They therefore submit that this appeal does not survive for consideration.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the appeal is dismissed as does not survive for consideration.
Sd/- (R.NATARAJ) JUDGE
Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
RH Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19