- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1210 RFA No. 100084 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100084 OF 2019 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI.MALLIKARJUN @ RAJU S/O. BASAPPA ARIBENCHI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR’S 1A) SMT. LAXMIBAI W/O. MALLIKARJUN ARIBENCHI AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, 1B) SRI. NIRUPAM S/O. LATE MALLIKARJUN ARIBENCHI AGE: 17 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, 1C) MISS. SARASWATI D/O. LATE MALLIKARJUN AGE: 14 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, ALL ARE R/O: KULAGOD – 591 310, TQ: MUDALAGI, DIST: BELAGAVI. 2. SMT. TUNGAWWA W/O. RAMAPPA ARIBENCHI AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: HALAGALI-587313, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOTE. 3. SMT. IRAWWA W/O. SADASHIV B. PATIL AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND HOUSEHOLD WORK, Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1210 RFA No. 100084 of 2019 R/O: MALLAPUR-587313, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOTE. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. A.P. MURARI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. KASTUREWWA W/O. GOVIND BIRADAR AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK AND AGRICULTURE, R/O: SANGAPUR S.H.-586125, TQ AND DIST: VIJAYAPURA. 2. YALLAPPA S/O. KRISHNAPPA DODAMANI AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: BUDNI P.M.-587313, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT. 3. SMT. SUNANDA W/O. SHEKHAPPA KARALINGANAVAR AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: SHIRUR-587 120, TQ AND DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN C. HUKKERI, ,ADVOCATE) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96(1) R/W. XLI RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.01.2019 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDHOL IN OS NO.127/2017 AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1210 RFA No. 100084 of 2019 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking for withdrawal of the appeal. Memo is supported by the affidavit of appellant No.3. Both memo and affidavit of appellant No.3 are placed on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE SRA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 66